As reported in this morning’s paper (http://www.lvrj.com/news/twelve-caesars-guests-hurt-in-escalator-mishap-70134642.html), a late-night escalator malfunction at Caesars’ Palace sent 12 people to the hospital. If warranted, those injured guests have two years from the date of this unfortunate incident in which to file suit against the hotel, the escalator manufacturer, or the maintenance company, whichever the case may be. If warranted, those injured would be wise to obtain legal representation quickly, because Caesar’s Palace’s lawyers have no doubt already been to the scene and are sorting out how best to deflect fault for the incident. In the meantime, those injured should be wary of attempts by Harrah’s/Caesar’s to “wine and dine” them in exchange for the signing of a benign-looking piece of paper called a “Release of Claims,” the signing of which would effectively extinguish their rights to seek compensation in court.
It does no good to spend millions of dollars on a lavish hotel if the most basic functions of the building are allowed to fall into disrepair. As reported in the Review-Journal, Caesar’s parent company, Harrah’s, is no stranger to code violations throughout its many properties here in Las Vegas. Escalator malfunctions such as the sudden, unexpected jerking experienced by the injured Caesar’s patrons typically suggest lapses in inspections, maintenance, upkeep, or all of the above, and those types of lapses (and the headlines they provoke) are bad for Las Vegas, and obviously worse for our unsuspecting visitors. I hope none of them were injured enough to warrant a call to our office.
Relatively speaking, collisions involving trucks happen as frequently on Nevada highways and roadways as anywhere else in the country. Injury cases arising out of truck accidents must be handled differently than the ordinary auto accident case. Trucking companies and their insurance defense lawyers have “rapid response teams” that rush to truck accident scenes, conduct their own investigations, and generally attempt “damage control” at the scene to the extent they can. This damage control done on behalf of the trucking company is not always done ethically or impartially, but more with an eye towards limiting or avoiding liability, all at a time when advocates for any injured parties (including truck drivers themselves) are absent, incapacitated, or dead.
Unlike an ordinary auto accident case, a plaintiff begins their truck accident injury case with the deck stacked against him or her, and must therefore play “catch up” in order to compete with the immense resources directed against them at the outset. If White & Wetherall gets called promptly after a truck collision case (occurring anywhere in Nevada), we have the ability to dispatch a “rapid response” team of our own, to insure evidence is obtained and preserved that might otherwise be inadvertently degraded, lost, or concealed on purpose. Of course, we are only able to mobilize this type of response if a friend or loved one contacts us ASAP after such an accident. Of course, that’s not always possible. Fortunately, even if weeks or months go by before we are contacted, there are still mechanisms and litigation techniques at our disposal to prevent the loss of valuable evidence.
Nevada law enforcement typically does a pretty good job of taking measurements and preserving evidence at truck accident scenes, but their investigation is not always as thorough as is required in an injury case. The moral of this message is, if at all possible, involve competent attorneys as quickly as possible after an accident involving a truck.
This past weekend, I was in Atlanta attending the Advanced Trial Advocacy College for litigating truck collision cases. I’m a member of the American Association for Justice’s Interstate Trucking Litigation Group, and routinely attend these specialized education seminars to update and improve my skill set. This Advocacy College was particularly intensive, and reinforced what I already knew about the handling of truck collision cases - regular auto accident attorneys shouldn’t be “dabbling” in truck collision cases.
Why do I say this? I mean no disrespect. There’s a number of reasons. First, the standards to which commercial vehicles are held are a matter of federal law, namely, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act (FMCSA), and most regular auto attorneys have little or no familiarity with these standards. Second, accidents involving trucks typically result in catastrophic injuries (given the forces, weights and speeds involved), and require a higher degree of medical knowledge (about traumatic brain injury, severe back injury, and paralysis) than the run-of-the-mill auto accident case. Third, understanding issues pertaining to insurance, multi-party liability, accident reconstruction, truck characteristics, trucking culture, and behaviors of the trucking industry is absolutely critical in order to attain a full and fair recovery in a trucking case. Trucking companies and their insurance carriers do not pony up millions of dollars for catastrophic injuries (or death) lightly, or easily. They often fight you to the bitter end.
The attorney and firm you choose to represent you in an truck collision must have specialized knowledge, financial resources, and experience to handle these cases competently. Keep this in mind if you or a loved one suffer the misfortune of being in a collision involving a truck. This advice extends to the thousands of safe and courteous truckers out there who are also injured in collisions or loading accidents, despite their best efforts to keep our highways safe. Most truck drivers are good people, but a lot of them work for reckless companies who put profits over safety.
Can your choice of attorney for your auto accident case make a difference in the money you recover? Think about it - don’t people in every profession have varying skill sets that dictate how well they do their work? Attorneys are no different. Should you care how experienced, knowledgeable, or involved a particular attorney will be in the handling of your case? The answer depends on how important your case is to you. If you don’t care how much money you recover as compensation for your injuries, then I suppose there’s no reason to care who handles your case. If you do care how much compensation you receive - if your hope is to maximize the money received by you at the end of your case - then you should care about your choice of attorney. The better or best accident attorneys don’t charge any more than the average ones, so why settle for average effort or ability?
So how do you find the attorney that’s best for you and your case? That’s easy – ask attorneys about their experience, knowledge, and what their personal level of involvement in your case will be if you hire them. Here are some other questions you can ask that will help you distinguish between the better attorneys from the merely adequate:
1) Who will be my primary contact in your office (should be the attorney);
2) What’s the range of value you perceive for my case;
3) What’s the range of recovery I can expect to receive “in-pocket” after deducting fees, costs, and medical liens on my case;
4) When was the last time you personally (or the attorney you intend to assign me) actually tried a case?
A skilled and dedicated injury attorney will take no offense to your asking these and other questions until you’re satisfied and comfortable, because he or she has nothing to fear by answering them.
Our firm has participated in blogging before, but I’m pleased to report that we are now able to blog directly from our web-site. For my part, my postings will include social commentary as well as (hopefully) useful information about Nevada law and our firm’s involvement in it. The challenge will be to fit this blogging effort into our busy practice, but I’ll certainly try my best to keep the posts frequent, fresh, and informative. Wish me luck! PCW
Welcome to White & Wetherall blog pages.
Hopefully, we can provide you with informative news and stories here.
